2023.5.7
A Close Look at PA6 and PA66 Properties – Part 2 In our previous article, we discussed the properties and applications of PA6 and PA66. In this installment, we will delve deeper into their mechanical properties.
PA6 has a higher impact resistance than PA66, which makes it a better choice for parts that need to withstand sudden shock loads. On the other hand, PA66 has a higher modulus of elasticity, making it stiffer and more suitable for parts that require high dimensional stability.
Click Here to Read Part 1st
Molecular Weight and Crystallinity:
When comparing the properties of PA6 and PA66, there are several structural differences to consider. PA66 has better long-term heat aging and higher heat deflection temperature compared to PA6. Additionally, PA66 has a higher modulus, better wear resistance, and better short-term heat resistance. On the other hand, PA6 has better hydrolytic stability, impact resistance, and dissolution resistance.
PA66 is semi-crystalline and has a higher melting point, while PA6 has a lower melting point and a wider range of process temperatures. This is because PA66 is derived from a diamine and diacid, while PA6 is derived from a diamine.
Despite these differences, both materials are widely used in various industries due to their excellent performance/cost ratios. It’s important to understand the slight variations in properties when deciding between using PA6 or PA66 for a specific application.
Click Here to Read Part 1st
Physical Properties of PA6 and PA66:
PA6 and PA66 both have excellent physical properties that make them popular choices for a variety of industries. Both materials have high strength and stiffness at high temperatures, good impact strength at low temperatures, good flowability, abrasion and wear resistance, fuel and oil resistance, and electrical insulation properties. In general, PA6 is more cost-effective with better hydrolytic stability, while PA66 has better temperature resistance and higher modulus.
Both materials are commonly used in automotive parts due to their design flexibility and temperature and chemical resistance, which can help reduce weight and CO2 emissions. However, these materials have some limitations as well. They are vulnerable to attack by strong mineral acids and polar solvents and have low dimensional stability. Proper drying is necessary before processing.
PA6 has better processability and surface appearance than PA66, while PA66 has better short-term heat resistance and wear resistance. Despite these differences, both materials offer an excellent performance/cost ratio for a wide range of applications in transportation, electronics, consumer goods, building and construction, and packaging industries.
Click Here to Read Part 1st
Density:
PA6 and PA66 are both high-density polyethylene (HDPE) plastics that have unique physical properties. PA6 has a density of 0.94 kg/L, while PA66 has a density of 1.03 kg/L. Both plastics have low Young’s modulus (E) values and high shear modulus values, making them strong and durable.
One key difference between the two is their glass transition temperature (Tg). PA6 has a higher Tg than PA66, which means it can withstand higher temperatures before becoming soft and pliable.
However, PA6 is more brittle than PA66, which makes it less suitable for use in high-stress applications. Its lower impact strength also makes it more susceptible to cracking or breaking under pressure.
Overall, understanding the physical properties of both materials is important when choosing between PA6 and PA66 for a specific application.
Tensile Strength:
When comparing the physical properties of PA6 and PA66, it’s important to consider factors such as tensile strength. PA66 has a higher melting point and better long-term heat aging compared to PA6, making it ideal for high temperature applications. In terms of tensile strength, PA66 also typically outperforms PA6.
However, PA6 has its strengths as well. It has better impact resistance and dissolution resistance than PA66, although it is more hygroscopic. Additionally, both materials have excellent performance/cost ratios, good flowability, and fuel/oil resistance, making them widely used in various industries.
When working with either material, proper drying before processing is required to prevent dimensional instability and damage from strong mineral acids and polar solvents. Overall, understanding the specific properties of each material can help you choose the right one for your application needs.
Impact Strength:
When it comes to comparing the physical properties of PA6 and PA66, impact strength is an important factor to consider. While both materials exhibit good impact strength at low temperatures, PA66 has slightly better impact strength than PA6.
In terms of other physical properties, PA6 has better hydrolytic stability than PA66. Additionally, while both materials have high heat resistance, PA66 has a slightly higher heat deflection temperature than PA6 and better short-term heat resistance.
Overall, understanding the differences in physical properties between these two materials can help in selecting the best option for a specific application.
Flexural Modulus:
When comparing the physical properties of PA6 and PA66, it’s important to consider the flexural modulus. PA66 has a higher flexural modulus compared to PA6, which contributes to improved safety and comfort in automotive applications. Both materials exhibit good impact strength and wear resistance, but there are some differences to note.
PA6 has better processability and surface appearance compared to PA66. However, it has a slightly lower temperature resistance and is slightly less expansive compared to PA66. Overall, both materials have their specific advantages depending on the intended use and application. It’s important to consider all physical properties when choosing between PA6 and PA66 for your particular project or product.
